RPE for Endurance & Team Sports: A Practical Guide for Athletes and Coaches
Author Athlog Team

Heart rate monitors, power meters, GPS watches — the options for tracking training load keep multiplying. But there's one metric that costs nothing, works in every sport, and has decades of research behind it: Rate of Perceived Exertion (RPE).
RPE is simply how hard a session felt, rated on a scale. When you multiply that rating by the session duration, you get session RPE (sRPE) — a single number that captures internal training load.
This guide covers what RPE is, how to collect it consistently, and how to turn it into actionable insight for both endurance and team sport athletes.
What RPE actually measures
RPE captures internal load: the physiological and psychological stress an athlete experiences during a session. External load (kilometers, watts, tonnage) tells you what was prescribed. Internal load tells you how the body responded.
Two athletes can run the same 10 km at the same pace and report very different RPE scores. That difference is the signal. It reflects fitness, fatigue, sleep quality, hydration, and a dozen other factors that no watch can fully capture.
The modified Borg CR-10 scale
The most widely used version in sport is the modified Borg CR-10 scale:
| Rating | Description |
|---|---|
| 1 | Very light (rest) |
| 2 | Light |
| 3 | Moderate |
| 4 | Somewhat hard |
| 5 | Hard |
| 6 | — |
| 7 | Very hard |
| 8 | — |
| 9 | Very, very hard |
| 10 | Maximal effort |
Athletes rate the overall effort of the session — not the hardest interval, not the warm-up, but the session as a whole.
Collecting RPE: timing and consistency
The standard recommendation: collect RPE 30 minutes after the session ends. This avoids two problems:
- Rating immediately after a hard finish tends to inflate the score.
- Waiting too long lets memory fade and social comparison creep in ("it wasn't that hard").
In practice, most coaches settle for "as soon as the athlete is back in normal clothes" — close enough to 30 minutes and far easier to enforce.
Tips for honest reporting
- Educate the scale. Spend five minutes at the start of a season explaining what each number means. Anchor it: "a 10 is the hardest physical effort you've ever done."
- Private entry. Athletes who submit RPE where teammates can see it tend to underreport. A training diary app or individual form avoids this.
- No judgment. If a coach reacts negatively to a high RPE, athletes learn to game the system. Treat the data as neutral information.
From RPE to session load (sRPE)
The formula is straightforward:
sRPE = RPE × session duration (minutes)
A 90-minute football training rated RPE 6 = 540 AU (arbitrary units). A 45-minute threshold run rated RPE 8 = 360 AU.
This works across sports because it standardizes load into a single currency. You can compare a swim session to a gym session to a match — something GPS or power data can't do without complicated normalization.
Using sRPE in endurance sports
Runners and cyclists
For athletes who already track distance and pace, sRPE adds context that pace alone misses. A 10 km run at 4:30/km pace might be RPE 5 on a fresh Monday and RPE 8 on a fatigued Friday. The external load is identical; the internal load is not.
sRPE is especially useful for:
- Heat and altitude. Same workout, much higher internal cost. RPE captures this automatically.
- Recovery runs. If an "easy" run consistently comes back at RPE 5+, something is off — the athlete may be carrying more fatigue than expected.
- Taper periods. Watching sRPE drop during a taper confirms the athlete is genuinely absorbing the reduction, not just doing less volume at the same intensity.
Swimmers
Pool training is notoriously hard to quantify externally. Stroke count, split times, and distance all matter — but sRPE gives coaches a quick read on whether a session landed where it was intended.
Collecting RPE from swimmers is also fast: one number on a whiteboard or a quick entry in an app before leaving the pool deck.
Using sRPE in team sports
Team sports present a unique challenge: athletes on the same squad do different amounts of work in the same session. A midfielder who played 90 minutes and a substitute who got 15 minutes of match time have wildly different loads — even though they were "at the same game."
sRPE handles this naturally. Each player rates their own effort and logs their own minutes. No two profiles need to look the same.
Match-day load
Match RPE tends to cluster between 7 and 9 for most field sports. The interesting variation is in duration: starters vs. substitutes, full-time vs. early substitution, extra time.
Some coaches collect RPE separately for matches and training to keep the data clean. Others combine everything into a weekly total. Either works — the key is consistency.
Training-day differentiation
In a typical football or rugby week, sessions vary from light tactical walk-throughs (RPE 2–3) to high-intensity small-sided games (RPE 7–8). sRPE lets coaches verify that the intended session intensity matched what athletes actually experienced.
If a "light recovery session" consistently comes back at RPE 5+ for half the squad, the session design needs revisiting — not the athletes.
Calculating weekly load and ACWR from sRPE
Once you're collecting daily sRPE, two derived metrics become available:
Weekly load
Sum all sRPE values across a 7-day window. This is the athlete's acute load. Track it week to week and you have a simple load progression chart.
Acute:Chronic Workload Ratio (ACWR)
ACWR = acute load (7 days) / chronic load (28-day rolling average).
- Below 0.8: the athlete is doing significantly less than their recent baseline — detraining risk or deliberate taper.
- 0.8–1.3: the "sweet spot" where load is progressing in a manageable range.
- Above 1.5: a load spike. The athlete's recent week is far above what they've been conditioned for. This is where injury risk climbs.
ACWR is a guide, not a verdict. Context matters: a spike during a planned overreach block is different from an accidental spike because training camps overlapped.
Common mistakes with RPE
Anchoring to heart rate. Some athletes try to reverse-engineer RPE from their HR data. The whole point of RPE is that it captures what HR misses — psychological load, thermal stress, accumulated fatigue. Let it stand on its own.
Changing the scale mid-season. Switching from a 1–10 scale to a 6–20 Borg scale (or vice versa) breaks continuity. Pick one and stick with it.
Averaging RPE across a group. Team-average RPE hides individual variation — exactly the variation you're trying to detect. Always look at individual data first.
Ignoring the trend. A single RPE score is almost meaningless. The value is in the pattern: rising RPE at constant external load signals accumulating fatigue. Dropping RPE at constant load signals adaptation.
Making RPE practical: the daily workflow
Here's a realistic workflow for a coach managing 15–30 athletes:
- Post-session: athletes log RPE and session duration in a shared app (e.g., Athlog). Takes 10 seconds.
- Evening review: coach scans the day's entries. Flag any RPE that deviates significantly from what the session intended.
- Weekly review: check weekly sRPE totals and ACWR for each athlete. Identify anyone above 1.5 or trending sharply upward.
- Conversation: follow up with flagged athletes. "Your RPE has been climbing this week — how are you feeling?" is more productive than "your ACWR is 1.6."
The goal is not to automate decisions. It's to have a reliable early-warning system that takes minimal time to maintain.
RPE and wellness: better together
RPE gets stronger when paired with a brief daily wellness check. Four questions, each rated 1–5:
- Sleep quality
- Energy / fatigue
- Muscle soreness
- Mood / motivation
When RPE is climbing and wellness scores are declining, the signal is clear: the athlete is accumulating more stress than they can absorb. Time to adjust.
When RPE climbs but wellness holds steady, the load increase is probably within tolerance — the athlete is being challenged but coping.
Getting started
You don't need a wearable, a lab, or a sports science degree. You need:
- A consistent scale (the modified Borg 1–10 works).
- A consistent collection window (~30 min post-session).
- A place to log it — pen and paper works, but an app like Athlog makes it searchable, visual, and shareable with the athlete.
Start collecting. After two weeks, you'll have enough data to spot patterns. After a month, you'll wonder how you coached without it.